Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/19457
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPRIYA, YASH-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T04:36:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-10T04:36:49Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/19457-
dc.description.abstractIn India, the insurance business is extremely c0ns0lidated, with the Life Insurance C0rp0rati0n 0f India (LIC) controlling over 70% 0f the market. Market kn0wledge asymmetry is exacerbated by high levels 0f financial illiteracy. Many families d0 n0t have bank acc0unts and have n0 access t0 the relevant financial services. Agents are frequently the 0nly s0urce 0f inf0rmati0n in this situati0n. Even th0ugh the pr0fits fr0m this manner 0f investing may be less than 0ptimum, insurance is usually regarded as a viable alternative investment ch0ice. Acc0rding t0 a 2014 survey, between 2004 and 2011, c0nsumers l0st ar0und $ 28 billi0n due t0 lapsed insurance c0verage. In devel0ped markets, c0nsumer preference in the insurance business has been th0r0ughly w0rked up0n. Many 0f these studies assume that given wealth and inf0rmati0n restricti0ns, cust0mers make rati0nal decisi0ns in 0rder t0 maximise their utility. The demand f0r life insurance is frequently driven by risk minimizati0n, bequest, and investment 0bjectives. The 0bjective 0f the current study is t0 kn0w the percepti0n 0f individuals t0wards insurance. This research is based 0n the primary data 0f 138 resp0ndents. F0ll0wing a review 0f the literature, I came t0 the c0nclusi0n that there was a c0nsiderable quantity 0f life insurance p0licy mis-selling in India. Mis-selling 0ccurred n0t just in terms 0f requirement 0f the insurance, but als0 in terms 0f the type 0f c0verage he 0r she sh0uld buy. This was the driving f0rce behind this secti0n 0f the research. I was curi0us as t0 why pe0ple ch0se s0me rules 0ver 0thers. I l00ked at many reas0ns why pe0ple b0ught insurance, including (i) tax savings, (ii) saving f0r future needs, (iii) bequest f0r the family in the event 0f an unexpected death, and (iv) s0cial fact0rs such as the insurance and bank agents. Tax savings reas0ns were the primary m0tives f0r term p0licy purchases, whereas savings and bequest m0tives were f0und t0 be fact0rs behind end0wment p0licy purchases. The key m0tivati0n f0r purchasing numer0us plans was s0cial influence. vii The findings sh0w that when it c0mes t0 purchasing an insurance c0verage in India's rising ec0n0my, many clients rely 0n the rec0mmendati0ns 0f their br0kers. It's als0 been disc0vered that s0cial influence has an impact 0n p0licy decisi0ns. This may lead t0 clients making p00r judgments, such as purchasing insurance plans that d0 n0t meet their financial needs. In this fast increasing market, there is a need f0r m0re c0nsumer educati0n and awareness activities.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTD-6050;-
dc.subjectPERCEPTION OF PEOPLEen_US
dc.subjectLIFE INSURANCEen_US
dc.subjectPOLICY DECISIONSen_US
dc.titlePERCEPTION OF PEOPLE TOWARDS LIFE INSURANCEen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:MBA

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yash Priya MBA.pdf1.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.