Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/15445
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | SHARMA, ABHAY | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-23T04:38:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-23T04:38:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-07 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/15445 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Flood estimation is very important for efficient design and safe construction of hydraulic structures. Inaccurate estimations may lead to under design or over design off structure thus causing heavy damage to life and property or excessive cost of the structure. In gauged catchments, frequency analysis of flood peaks is used to calculate a required return period flood as adequate flood data are available in such regions. In ungauged catchments, regional approach is adopted for flood estimation due to inadequate flood data. In synthetic hydrograph method, UH parameters are correlated with geomorphologic parameters rather than available rainfall-runoff data for reliable flood estimation. UH parameters are calculated and a curve is fitted through these points by trial method (maintaining area under curve) which is a very complex and time consuming method. Use of hit and trial method can be avoided if Probability Density Functions such as such as Gamma, Chi –Square, Beta etc are used. These functions have the advantage that area under curve is unity and shape is known. Gamma Distribution Function (GDF) has been used in the present study for calculation of UH parameters and the required return period flood of Chambal Subzone 1(b). Results indicate that UH parameters calculated using GDF is in close agreement with the data provided for the subzone and the UH parameters are highly correlated as compared to SUH methods. Peaks of 50 year return period Flood Hydrograph calculated using both SUH and GDF methods have very high correlation coefficient between peak discharge and geomorphologic variables (A, L, S, and Rf). Unit Hydrograph parameters and derived geomorphologic parameters for 26 subzones all over India have been studied. It is found that geomorphological parameters used by CWC for various subzones are better correlated with UH parameters than other proposed geomorphologic parameters (L/S0.5, L2/AS etc). For more accurate studies in a region, multiple correlation method or various probability distribution functions may be studied to find the most accurate method applicable for the region. Variation of UH parameters with Area(A), Length(L) and Slope(S) for various subzones is studied to find the appropriate geomorphologic parameters affecting the behavior of hydrograph parameters in ungauged sites.. Results of peak discharge as a function of A or A/L or A/SL indicate that for small ungauged sites, Qp may roughly be estimated as a non linear function of area independently, in absence of other geomorphologic data. Geomorphologic study of the region may be carried out in future for better understanding of the area using Arc-GIS. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | TD NO.1548; | - |
dc.subject | FLOOD ESTIMATION | en_US |
dc.subject | GAMMA HYDROGRAPH | en_US |
dc.subject | SUH METHOD | en_US |
dc.subject | CATCHMENTS | en_US |
dc.title | COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GAMMA HYDROGRAPH AND SUH METHOD FOR FLOOD ESTIMATION IN UNGAUGED CATCHMENTS | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | M.E./M.Tech. Civil Engineering |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
COVER PAGE.pdf | 24.08 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
Initial pages.pdf | 310.56 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
THESIS_ABHAY final.pdf | 1.46 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.