Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/13192
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMEENA, JAGDEESH PRASAD-
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-09T13:06:28Z-
dc.date.available2011-02-09T13:06:28Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01-25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/13192-
dc.descriptionME THESISen_US
dc.description.abstractAd-hoc networks are characterized by a lack of infrastructure, and by a random and quickly changing network topology; thus the need for a robust dynamic routing protocol that can accommodate such an environment. Consequently, many routing algorithms have come in to existence to satisfy the needs of communications in such networks. This thesis presents a performance comparison between two categories of routing protocols, table-driven (Proactive) and on-demand (Reactive) routing protocols, this two categories were illustrated by using two different examples of routing protocols, first example is DSDV (Destination Sequenced Distance-Vector) from the Proactive family and the second example is AODV (Ad Hoc On- Demand Distance Vector) from the Reactive family. Both protocols were simulated by using NS-2 (network simulator-2) package. Both routing protocols were compared in terms of average throughput (packets delivery ratio) and packet loss ratio, while varying number of nodes and ...en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTD622;70-
dc.subjectProactiveen_US
dc.subjectReactiveen_US
dc.subjectRouting Protocolsen_US
dc.subjectMANETsen_US
dc.titleSTUDY AND IMPLEMENTATION ON PROACTIVE AND REACTIVE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MANETsen_US
Appears in Collections:M.E./M.Tech. Computer Technology & Applications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
report.pdf2.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.