<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/126">
    <title>DSpace Community:</title>
    <link>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/126</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18950" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18925" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18365" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18315" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-28T05:26:14Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18950">
    <title>SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF MASONRY STRUCTURE</title>
    <link>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18950</link>
    <description>Title: SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF MASONRY STRUCTURE
Authors: DEOL, VIDIT
Abstract: From the beginning of construction history, masonry have been most widely used material &#xD;
Because of its light weight, great durability, fire resistance, thermal insulating characteristics, &#xD;
relatively simple method of construction and execution, and low cost, masonry has been the &#xD;
most extensively used material in construction history. Apart from possessing such features, &#xD;
masonry is thought to have several disadvantages, such as distinct directional (orthotropic) &#xD;
qualities. weak strength, mortar connections without proper thickness, low interface binding &#xD;
strength between brick and mortar, poor treatment and improper methods of installation, etc.,&#xD;
Chourasia, A. et. al. (2017) [6]&#xD;
. Besides, having weak strength and weak seismic behaviour&#xD;
masonry is still used heavily in construction for structures all around the world notably for low rise buildings up to three floors, as well as antique and medieval structures.&#xD;
Masonry can be used in construction with or without reinforcement; however, providing &#xD;
reinforcement improves masonry's seismic performance. Confined masonry is a relatively new &#xD;
type of masonry that has been presented, where light-reinforced frame elements (tie beams and &#xD;
columns) are utilized to enclose a masonry wall, the system acts as a single unit under load, &#xD;
providing ductility and strong seismic properties. Confined masonry has been found to be &#xD;
superior to reinforced masonry in some cases.&#xD;
In this report a residentials G+3 building in, Delhi has been studied, building in its natural form &#xD;
is constructed of masonry single brick thick with 250 mm concrete slab. The building is further &#xD;
modelled in ETABS (2018) [12]&#xD;
software with masonry as thin shell element of 230 mm thick &#xD;
and concrete slab of 250 mm thickness and dead, live and seismic load is applied on this &#xD;
building. Building is further modified and modelled in software with a 1) lintel band and 2) &#xD;
with confining elements (confined masonry) and change is seismic behaviour and capacity is &#xD;
studied.</description>
    <dc:date>2021-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18925">
    <title>SEISMIC RESPONSE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME  RESTING ON HILL SLOPES</title>
    <link>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18925</link>
    <description>Title: SEISMIC RESPONSE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME  RESTING ON HILL SLOPES
Authors: VERMA, SAURAV KUMAR
Abstract: The Constructions done in the hilly regions are more vulnerable seismically in contrast with &#xD;
the structures built in flat terrains. The structures constructed in hilly regions are usually &#xD;
irregular, these structures are irregular both in mass and stiffness. Constructions done on the &#xD;
sloping ground is different from usual structures since they're asymmetrical in both horizontal &#xD;
and vertical directions. Columns of the bottommost storey have a varying height because of &#xD;
inclining ground and are torsionally coupled, henceforth draw in a lot of shear forces, and &#xD;
without proper detailing building constructed on sloping ground is susceptible to moderate to &#xD;
heavy damage. In this analysis, the seismic response of three different building configurations &#xD;
i.e., Regular, Stepback, Stepback-Setback is evaluated. The structural analysis tool ETABS &#xD;
2017 was used to perform seismic analysis utilising the linear static and dynamic methods. &#xD;
Buildings on a hill slope with various configurations are studied in two parts; first being: bare &#xD;
frame, soft storey, totally concrete blockwork infill, a soft storey with shear wall at corners, &#xD;
frame with composite columns at the bottommost storey and second part being: L-shear &#xD;
walls(LSW) at the corners, C shear-walls at core(CSW) and Reinforced concrete-filled steel &#xD;
tube column (RCFST) at corners and core in stepback, and stepback-setback configurations. &#xD;
The characteristic parameters such as base shear, forces in the columns at the ground floor, &#xD;
storey drift, maximum top storey displacement, time period, the bending moment in columns &#xD;
at every floor level and storey shear in structures will be determined and analysed for the &#xD;
different structures at the sloping ground. Finally, the reasonableness of various designs of &#xD;
slope structures would be proposed.</description>
    <dc:date>2021-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18365">
    <title>RESPONCE VINDICATION OF EFFECTS OF CORNER CONFIGURATION AND INTERFERENCE ON TALL BUILDINGS UNDER WIND LOADS USING CFD MODELLING</title>
    <link>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18365</link>
    <description>Title: RESPONCE VINDICATION OF EFFECTS OF CORNER CONFIGURATION AND INTERFERENCE ON TALL BUILDINGS UNDER WIND LOADS USING CFD MODELLING
Authors: GAUR, NIKHIL
Abstract: This study explores a recent application of the computational fluid &#xD;
dynamics technique “CFD” for wind analysis and its comparisons with the &#xD;
conventional wind tunnel experimentations. This study is centered on the wind &#xD;
response of square and corner cut-shaped building models and its optimization &#xD;
caused by the variation of the wind incidence angle. Extensive rigid model &#xD;
experiments of two building models of length scale 1:100 have been performed in the &#xD;
boundary layer wind tunnel. The numerical analysis has been carried out with the &#xD;
standard k-ε turbulence model to evaluate the force coefficients, base moments, &#xD;
power spectra, external surface pressure coefficients, and flow field characteristics of &#xD;
the models with variable wind angles of incidence. The comparisons between &#xD;
experimental results and CFD analysis suggest the computational approach’s &#xD;
viability in wind analysis of tall structures efficiently and accurately. A case study of &#xD;
aerodynamic mitigation by corner cut suggests minor modification techniques &#xD;
performance, efficiency, and limitations. Wind induced interference plays a vital role &#xD;
in the design of tall structures. However, the complex features of structure design and &#xD;
shape require a detailed wind tunnel/CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) study as &#xD;
codal provisions don’t suffice for such scattered parameters. iv&#xD;
 The current study focuses on the effects of height ratio, orientation, and &#xD;
blockage configuration of interfering structure on interference effects. Interference &#xD;
factor (IF), transient pressure, and force spectra are used to account for the &#xD;
interference effects at major probe points to understand the dynamic wind response.&#xD;
To study these effects among complex arrangements, a numerical simulation for a &#xD;
CFD analysis on a corner configured principal building model and a single upstream &#xD;
interfering building model having identical geometry has been performed. The &#xD;
configuration included six kinds of heights ratio (Hr=Hprincipal/Hinterfering). &#xD;
Furthermore, force coefficients, base moments, and external surface pressure &#xD;
coefficients both in the along and across wind direction are determined and listed for &#xD;
wind incidence angle of attack of 0° to 90° at an interval of 15°. Interference effects &#xD;
among full, half, and no blockage conditions were investigated. The data is presented &#xD;
in terms of the interference factor relating wind load responses of the isolated &#xD;
principal building to interference configuration. The results indicate that in close &#xD;
proximity of structure, the shielding effect suppresses the interference effects on the &#xD;
principal building, but across wind responses have been investigated in close vicinity &#xD;
configurations too. This study also suggests the interfering model’s orientation &#xD;
contributes to great measures to the wind response under interference.</description>
    <dc:date>2020-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18315">
    <title>SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEEL BRACED FRAME STRUCTURES</title>
    <link>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/18315</link>
    <description>Title: SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEEL BRACED FRAME STRUCTURES
Authors: SINGH, ROHIT
Abstract: The progress of steel usage has provided a significant growth in construction industry.&#xD;
It is well established that steel provides better ductility ,stability and strength to the&#xD;
structure. The structure should be good enough to withstand seismic loads as well as&#xD;
lateral loads. This study aims to determine that the steel braces is one of the best&#xD;
method to reduce seismic forces specifically knee bracing which gives most of the&#xD;
lateral stiffness and flexural yielding. In this context a 6 storey knee steel frame&#xD;
structure with a plan of 9 m *9 m is utilized. To test the results that the knee braced&#xD;
framed structure gives better results than the bared frame. A 6 storey knee braced steel&#xD;
structure has been analyzed using ETABS software based on IS 1893:2002 guidelines.&#xD;
Equivalent static analysis method used for calculating base shear and lateral force on&#xD;
each storey and compared with bare frame. ETABS software results are compared&#xD;
with manual results.</description>
    <dc:date>2020-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

