<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/16858" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/16858</id>
  <updated>2026-11-13T11:47:05Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-11-13T11:47:05Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>WAGE INEQUALITY AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT IN  INDIA</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23452" />
    <author>
      <name>BHARGAVI</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Jain, Neha (SUPERVISOR)WAGE INEQUALITY AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT IN  INDIA</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23452</id>
    <updated>2026-11-13T04:49:39Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: WAGE INEQUALITY AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT IN  INDIA
Authors: BHARGAVI; Jain, Neha (SUPERVISOR)WAGE INEQUALITY AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT IN  INDIA
Abstract: India's labour market has gone through considerable restructuring over the past two decades. &#xD;
Economic liberalisation, rapid technological change, and an expanding service sector have &#xD;
together produced a labour market in which skilled workers capture a disproportionately large &#xD;
share of wage gains, while low-wage workers, who make up the vast majority of the &#xD;
workforce, continue to face stagnant real earnings and precarious employment. Against this &#xD;
backdrop, successive central government administrations have invested heavily in skill &#xD;
development programmes, from the Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) to the Pradhan Mantri &#xD;
Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) and the Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Grameen Kaushalya &#xD;
Yojana (DDU-GKY), disbursing over ₹6,000 crore annually in an effort to close the skill gap &#xD;
and improve labour market outcomes for disadvantaged workers. What remains thin, even so, &#xD;
is robust, distribution-sensitive evidence on whether these interventions actually reach the &#xD;
workers who need them most. &#xD;
This dissertation looks at the relationship between skill development and wages across the full &#xD;
wage distribution of Indian workers, using data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey &#xD;
(PLFS) 2023 to 24, the most recent nationally representative household survey conducted by &#xD;
the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. The analytic &#xD;
sample comprises 46,294 wage workers aged 15 to 65 drawn from both rural and urban areas &#xD;
across all major states. The core estimation strategy is quantile regression (Koenker &amp; Bassett, &#xD;
1978), which allows the conditional wage effects of education, vocational training, and other &#xD;
worker characteristics to be estimated at five quantile points, the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and &#xD;
90th percentiles of the log-wage distribution, directly addressing the main limitation of prior &#xD;
Indian studies that rely on OLS and estimate only mean effects. &#xD;
The econometric model is grounded in an augmented Mincerian earnings function. The &#xD;
dependent variable is the natural log of the monthly wage. Key regressors include years of &#xD;
formal education, a binary indicator for formal vocational training (skill dummy, equal to 1 if &#xD;
the worker received certified vocational training), potential labour market experience &#xD;
constructed as age minus years of education minus 6, experience squared, and a set of &#xD;
demographic controls for gender (female dummy), rural/urban location (urban dummy), and &#xD;
social group membership (SC, ST, and OBC dummies), with 'Others' as the reference &#xD;
category. Employment type (self-employed, regular wage, casual labour) is also incorporated &#xD;
in the OLS specifications. Robust standard errors are used throughout. &#xD;
Six main findings emerge. First, returns to formal education rise monotonically across &#xD;
quantiles, from 6.9 per cent per year at the 10th percentile to 11.5 per cent at the 90th &#xD;
percentile, confirming that education is a force for wage divergence at current rates of return. &#xD;
Second, vocational training yields an inverted-U pattern: returns peak at the median (18.2 per &#xD;
cent), are moderate at the lower tail (11.4 per cent at Q10), and decline at the upper tail (10.5 &#xD;
per cent at Q90), making training more egalitarian in its distributional footprint than formal &#xD;
education. Third, the female wage penalty is largest at the bottom of the distribution (−67.9 &#xD;
log points at Q10) and narrows substantially but remains large at the top (−19.4 log points at &#xD;
Q90), consistent with the sticky floor hypothesis. Fourth, SC and OBC wage penalties widen &#xD;
at higher quantile points, indicating that caste-based barriers to high-skill, high-wage &#xD;
employment are the primary mechanism of disadvantage rather than uniform wage &#xD;
suppression. Fifth, the urban wage premium is largest at Q10 (23.2 per cent) and declines &#xD;
modestly to Q90 (17.1 per cent), suggesting urban labour markets provide proportionately &#xD;
greater gains to low-wage workers. Sixth, experience returns are stable across quantiles at &#xD;
approximately 4 per cent per year and do not contribute to distributional divergence. &#xD;
These findings carry direct policy implications. Targeting PMKVY and DDU-GKY enrolment &#xD;
toward low-wage workers, particularly women, SC/ST workers, and rural youth, would &#xD;
concentrate public resources where the relative returns to training are meaningful. Reforming &#xD;
curriculum and certification to align with industry demand, expanding training infrastructure &#xD;
in rural areas, designing gender-disaggregated programmes, and strengthening anti&#xD;
discrimination enforcement in higher-wage employment are complementary interventions that &#xD;
training policy alone cannot substitute.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING BOX  OFFICE REVENUE OF ANIMATED FILMS: EVIDENCE FROM AI-MEDIATED DIGITAL MARKET  SIGNALS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23451" />
    <author>
      <name>AHMAD, SUHEAL</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Aggarwal, Deepti (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23451</id>
    <updated>2026-11-13T04:22:33Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING BOX  OFFICE REVENUE OF ANIMATED FILMS: EVIDENCE FROM AI-MEDIATED DIGITAL MARKET  SIGNALS
Authors: AHMAD, SUHEAL; Aggarwal, Deepti (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: The global animated film sector experienced a significant structural shift between 2015 and &#xD;
2023, largely spurred by the rise of AI-driven digital platforms, the swift growth of &#xD;
subscription streaming services, and the increasing commercial impact of algorithmic &#xD;
recommendation systems on audience behaviour. In this changing environment, the &#xD;
traditional framework of film economics, which primarily focuses on production budgets and &#xD;
critical reviews, fails to adequately explain the commercial success of animated films. This &#xD;
dissertation empirically investigates the factors that affect worldwide box office revenue for &#xD;
animated films released during this timeframe, paying particular attention to whether AI&#xD;
mediated digital market signals have independent commercial value beyond conventional &#xD;
production-related factors. The research utilises a secondary dataset comprising 13,440 &#xD;
observations of animated films obtained from The Movie Database (TMDB), the Internet &#xD;
Movie Database (IMDb), and Box Office Mojo, encompassing animated theatrical releases &#xD;
globally from 2015 to 2023. The dependent variable in this study is worldwide box office &#xD;
revenue. In contrast, the four independent variables include production budget, the TMDB &#xD;
algorithmic popularity score, total audience vote count, and average vote. The primary &#xD;
analytical method employed is Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) multiple linear regression, &#xD;
conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 26) with the Enter method. A Pearson &#xD;
bivariate correlation analysis is performed as a supplementary diagnostic step before &#xD;
regression estimation. The regression model exhibits considerable explanatory power, &#xD;
accounting for roughly 69 per cent of the variance in worldwide box office revenue (R² = &#xD;
0.690, Adjusted R² = 0.690, F = 7,475.594, p &lt; 0.001). All four predictors are statistically &#xD;
significant at the 0.001 level. Vote count is the most influential predictor (β = 0.607, t = &#xD;
81.434, p &lt; 0.001), indicating that the level of AI-mediated audience interaction on digital &#xD;
rating platforms is the primary driver of commercial success. Production budget follows in &#xD;
importance (β = 0.218, B = 0.989, p &lt; 0.001), with an unstandardized coefficient near 1, &#xD;
suggesting that animated films tend to recoup their production costs through box-office &#xD;
iv &#xD;
earnings at the margin. The TMDB algorithmic popularity score, which serves as the main &#xD;
AI-mediated signal variable in this study, reveals a notable positive independent coefficient &#xD;
(β = 0.146, B = 140,205.597, t = 28.866, p &lt; 0.001), indicating that visibility generated by AI &#xD;
on platforms significantly influences box office revenues, independent of budget and &#xD;
audience engagement. The vote average shows a small yet statistically significant negative &#xD;
partial effect (β = −0.024, t = −4.961, p &lt; 0.001), reflecting a market-segmentation dynamic &#xD;
rather than a negative correlation between film quality and commercial performance in &#xD;
absolute terms. The hierarchy of standardised effects ranks vote count (0.607), budget &#xD;
(0.218), popularity (0.146), and vote average (0.024 in absolute value), providing a clear, &#xD;
evidence-based ranking of the commercial drivers for the animated film industry in the &#xD;
digital age. This study contributes in three main ways: it offers a large-sample empirical &#xD;
analysis of the global animated film market for a contemporary period not previously studied &#xD;
at this scale; it explicitly operationalizes and empirically tests an AI-generated algorithmic &#xD;
metric as a distinct category of revenue predictor; and it provides directly interpretable &#xD;
economic magnitudes that producers, investors, and digital marketers can utilize to assess the &#xD;
commercial returns on investments in digital engagement. Keywords: Animated films; box &#xD;
office revenue; AI-mediated digital signals; TMDB popularity score; vote count; film &#xD;
economics; OLS regression; digital platform economics; algorithmic visibility; audience &#xD;
engagement.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ECONOMIC GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY: A  CASE STUDY OF MINING INDUSTRY IN  JHARKHAND, ODISHA AND CHHATTISGARH</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23450" />
    <author>
      <name>TIRKEY, SPRIHA</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Arora, Rajiv (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23450</id>
    <updated>2026-11-13T04:15:07Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: ECONOMIC GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY: A  CASE STUDY OF MINING INDUSTRY IN  JHARKHAND, ODISHA AND CHHATTISGARH
Authors: TIRKEY, SPRIHA; Arora, Rajiv (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh are the mineral rich states of India and contribute major &#xD;
share of production of coal, iron ore and limestone. Despite this wealth of resources, they &#xD;
continue to face high infant mortality rates, low SDG rankings and huge social challenges &#xD;
especially among tribal communities.  &#xD;
The study examined the relationship between mining and social sustainability by using data &#xD;
from 2014 to 2024. The main indicator of social welfare was the Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) &#xD;
and a Panel Fixed Effects (LSDV) regression model was used. The factors considered in the &#xD;
analysis were per capita GSDP, mining share of GSDP, DMF expenditure, forest cover and the &#xD;
MMDR 2015 reform. &#xD;
The results are mining intensity is a strong and statistically significant positive predictor of &#xD;
infant mortality (r = 0.713, p &lt; 0.001; β = +0.998, p = 0.006). This supports the idea that &#xD;
structural mineral dependence degrades health outcomes rather than improves them the &#xD;
resource curse, quantified. Second, per capita GSDP has no significant effect on IMR (p = &#xD;
0.500), meaning the income generated by mining does not reach the communities who pay for &#xD;
it with their health and their forests. Third, the MMDR 2015 reform dummy is the most &#xD;
significant predictor in the model (β = −5.960, p &lt; 0.001) and correlated with about six fewer &#xD;
infant deaths per thousand live births in the post-reform period evidence that structural policy &#xD;
reform can work when properly designed. Fourth, in these states, despite the collection of more &#xD;
than thirty thousand crore rupees across the three states, the impact of DMF expenditure on &#xD;
IMR has been statistically insignificant (r = −0.054, p = 0.776). This is a governance failure, &#xD;
not a design failure. &#xD;
The study highlights the need for urgent reforms in DMF governance structures, a regulation &#xD;
minimum allocation for healthcare from DMF funds, economic diversification away from &#xD;
mineral dependence and consistent enforcement of the MMDR compliance framework.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ESG PERFORMANCE, CARBON DISCLOSURE QUALITY,  CARBON COMMITMENT,  VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE AND GREENWASHING:  EVIDENCE FROM LISTED COMPANIES</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23449" />
    <author>
      <name>SAKSHAM</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Kaushik, Aakansha (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23449</id>
    <updated>2026-11-13T04:07:34Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: ESG PERFORMANCE, CARBON DISCLOSURE QUALITY,  CARBON COMMITMENT,  VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE AND GREENWASHING:  EVIDENCE FROM LISTED COMPANIES
Authors: SAKSHAM; Kaushik, Aakansha (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: This dissertation investigates whether the quality, commitment, and voluntarism of &#xD;
sustainability disclosure by listed Indian companies—as mandated under the Business &#xD;
Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) framework—genuinely reflect &#xD;
environmental performance, or whether it constitutes a form of symbolic reporting that &#xD;
masks operational inaction, a phenomenon widely characterised as greenwashing. &#xD;
Three original measurement instruments are developed from BRSR-mandated &#xD;
corporate filings: the Disclosure Quality Index (DQI), a five-dimension composite &#xD;
covering breadth, depth, quantitative substance, implementation evidence, and &#xD;
governance credibility, weighted using Shannon entropy to address the saturation &#xD;
problem endemic to existing binary disclosure measures; the Carbon Commitment &#xD;
Index (CCI), which captures the formal architecture of climate compliance through &#xD;
environmental impact assessment, risk governance, and regulatory conformance &#xD;
disclosures; and the Voluntary Disclosure Index (VDI), which measures the degree to &#xD;
which firms exceed the mandatory reporting floor. &#xD;
The analytical sample comprises 744 de-duplicated firm-year observations drawn from &#xD;
FY2025 BRSR filings of NSE-listed Indian companies spanning 14 sector groupings. &#xD;
All three indices are subjected to standard psychometric and convergent validity tests. &#xD;
The dissertation then develops a Greenwashing Index by cross-referencing index &#xD;
scores against independently observed emission intensity. It assigns each firm to one &#xD;
of six descriptive categories—ranging from Genuine Sustainability Leaders through &#xD;
Transparent Performers and Commitment Leaders to Symbolic Reporters, Potential &#xD;
Greenwashers, and Severe Greenwashers. &#xD;
Empirical results, estimated using median (least-absolute-deviations) regression, &#xD;
Huber-robust regression, and OLS with heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors &#xD;
on 716 complete-emission observations, yield four principal findings. First, the DQI &#xD;
is positively and significantly associated with emission intensity (DQI_noD3: β = &#xD;
+1.70, p &lt; 0.001), indicating that higher disclosure quality is correlated with higher—&#xD;
not lower—carbon performance, consistent with the legitimacy-theory prediction that &#xD;
high-emitting firms invest disproportionately in disclosure form. Second, the CCI is &#xD;
negatively associated with emission intensity in both Huber and median regressions (β &#xD;
= −0.226, p &lt; 0.001), suggesting that firms with more robust climate-compliance &#xD;
governance achieve lower emission intensity once the scale effect of absolute &#xD;
emissions is removed. Third, the VDI exhibits a flat, non-significant relationship with &#xD;
emissions, reflecting widespread saturation at the mandatory compliance ceiling. &#xD;
Fourth, the quadrant classification identifies 265 of 716 firms (37.0 per cent) as &#xD;
Greenwashers—a proportion materially and statistically above the 25 per cent random &#xD;
benchmark—while only 149 firms (20.8 per cent) qualify as Substantive disclosers &#xD;
whose reported quality is matched by genuine environmental performance. &#xD;
The findings extend the symbolic-disclosure framework and the legitimacy&#xD;
management literature to a mandatory disclosure regime in an emerging economy, and &#xD;
generate actionable implications for SEBI regulators, ESG ratings agencies, and &#xD;
institutional investors.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

