<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/16296" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/16296</id>
  <updated>2026-04-28T06:47:03Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-28T06:47:03Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENTS AND INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY FROM INVESTORS’ PERSPECTIVE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22349" />
    <author>
      <name>MANASWI, KUMAR</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22349</id>
    <updated>2025-12-10T10:05:00Z</updated>
    <published>2025-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENTS AND INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY FROM INVESTORS’ PERSPECTIVE
Authors: MANASWI, KUMAR
Abstract: The global spotlight on sustainability, ethical governance, and responsible corporate&#xD;
practices has led to an increased interest in integrating Environmental, Social, and&#xD;
Governance (ESG) into investment decisions. This thesis investigates the performance&#xD;
and implications of ESG-based investments, particularly within the Indian market,&#xD;
aiming to explore how ESG criteria influence financial outcomes and asset managers‘&#xD;
investment strategies. Given the growing interest in sustainable investing worldwide,&#xD;
the study is critical, especially in emerging markets like India. The rationale behind&#xD;
this study stems from the urgent global challenges that require immediate attention,&#xD;
including climate change, social inequality, unethical corporate practices, and&#xD;
environmental degradation. Further, ESG investing, also known as sustainable or&#xD;
responsible investing, has gained considerable traction, particularly in developed&#xD;
economies such as the USA, the European Union, and Japan. However, its adoption in&#xD;
India remains nascent.&#xD;
Three primary objectives drive this study.&#xD;
The first objective was to assess the impact of ESG on shareholder wealth, using&#xD;
Tobin‘s Q as a proxy to measure the wealth of shareholders in companies listed on the&#xD;
Nifty 500 index. This involved a comprehensive analysis of ESG scores of firms&#xD;
spanning the period from 2015 to 2022, with ESG scores extracted from Bloomberg&#xD;
and financial data from Prowess. The study also examined whether innovation&#xD;
moderates the relationship between ESG and shareholders' wealth. Fixed Effects&#xD;
Panel Data regression was employed to analyse the relationship between ESG scores&#xD;
and shareholder wealth. Tobin‘s Q was the dependent variable, while the independent&#xD;
variables included combined ESG scores and their individual components (E, S, and&#xD;
G). Four models were tested to determine whether environmental, social, and&#xD;
governance scores were significantly associated with shareholders' wealth.&#xD;
The second objective was to analyse the performance of ESG-based portfolios to&#xD;
determine whether ESG investments yield competitive returns compared to traditional&#xD;
investments. These portfolios were created based on ESG scores. The top 10% of total&#xD;
v&#xD;
firms based on ESG scores had a separate portfolio, and similarly, the Bottom 10%&#xD;
consisted of firms with the lowest ESG scores. Based on this, the study assessed a&#xD;
total of eight portfolios - TOPESG, BOTTOMESG, TOP ENV, BOTTOMENV,&#xD;
TOPSOC, BOTTOMSOC, TOPGOV, and BOTTOMGOV. Out of 500 firms in the&#xD;
Nifty 500, only 278 had ESG scores from Bloomberg Terminal; therefore, each&#xD;
portfolio consisted of twenty-eight firms. After the construction of these portfolios,&#xD;
they were assessed using the Fama-French five-factor model to assess the&#xD;
performance of these portfolios. In the Fama-French five-factor model, portfolios are&#xD;
assessed based on five factors: market risk premium, size, value, profitability, and&#xD;
investment. This assessment allowed for a nuanced examination of how ESG interact&#xD;
with traditional risk factors (such as market risk and value risk) in explaining portfolio&#xD;
returns.&#xD;
The third objective was to evaluate the role of ESG in shaping the investment&#xD;
decisions of asset managers in India and whether professional experience moderates&#xD;
this relationship. A structured questionnaire was designed and distributed to asset&#xD;
managers across India, resulting in 41 responses. The data collected was analysed&#xD;
using Smart PLS 4.0, with a focus the influence of environmental, social, and&#xD;
governance factors on investment decisions, as well as the moderating role of&#xD;
professional experience in shaping these decisions.&#xD;
The findings of this study offer valuable insights into the current state of ESG&#xD;
investing in India. The findings from the first objective revealed that there was no&#xD;
statistically significant relationship between overall ESG scores and shareholder&#xD;
wealth. Similarly, the individual environmental and social scores did not show a&#xD;
significant association with shareholders‘ wealth. In contrast, the Governance score&#xD;
had a significant positive impact on shareholders‘ wealth, indicating that investors&#xD;
highly value strong corporate governance practices. Companies with robust&#xD;
governance mechanisms—such as transparency, accountability, and effective risk&#xD;
management—tend to inspire greater investor confidence, which in turn positively&#xD;
impacts their market valuation. This emphasises the significance of governance as a&#xD;
fundamental component of ESG and accentuates the necessity for Indian corporations&#xD;
to enhance their governance frameworks in order to attract more ESG-conscious&#xD;
vi&#xD;
investors. These findings suggest that ESG, particularly environmental and social&#xD;
aspects, are not yet fully integrated into investment strategies in India. One possible&#xD;
explanation is that Indian investors and asset managers may not be sufficiently aware&#xD;
of the financial benefits of ESG integration. Alternatively, they may be deterred by the&#xD;
perceived costs and risks associated with implementing sustainable practices,&#xD;
especially in a developing economy like India. The second objective, which focused&#xD;
on the assessment of portfolios based on ESG, provided additional insights into the&#xD;
potential of ESG investing. The study revealed that the governance-based portfolios&#xD;
(TOPGOV) demonstrated positive alpha, suggesting that governance-focused&#xD;
investments can deliver positive returns even after adjusting for market and value&#xD;
risks. In contrast, the environmental and social portfolios (TOPESG, BOTTOMESG,&#xD;
TOPENV, and TOPSOC) exhibited negative alpha, implying that there may be&#xD;
unexplained factors—beyond those captured by the traditional risk factors—that&#xD;
negatively affect returns. This highlights the complexity of ESG investing and the&#xD;
need for further research to uncover the underlying drivers of these returns.&#xD;
Furthermore, in the third objective, the study also investigated the impact of ESG on&#xD;
Asset managers‘ investment decisions. The findings were mixed, with environmental&#xD;
factors showing no significant impact on investment decisions, while social and&#xD;
governance factors were influential. Asset managers appear to prioritise companies&#xD;
with strong social and governance practices, likely due to the perceived stability and&#xD;
ethical integrity these practices bring to their investments. The role of professional&#xD;
experience was also significant, with more experienced asset managers emphasizing&#xD;
social and governance factors in their decision-making process. This suggests that&#xD;
professional experience enhances the ability to recognise the long-term value of&#xD;
sustainable practices, particularly in social responsibility and corporate governance.&#xD;
The implications of this study are significant for a variety of stakeholders.&#xD;
Policymakers can draw inferences from this study to focus on improving corporate&#xD;
governance standards and promoting greater transparency in ESG reporting. By doing&#xD;
so, they can create a more conducive environment for sustainable investing in India.&#xD;
For corporations, the research underscores the importance of strengthening&#xD;
governance practices to enhance investor confidence and attract more ESG-focused&#xD;
vii&#xD;
investments. The study also reinforces the significance of professional development&#xD;
and training in ESG for managers, as more experienced managers are more likely to&#xD;
make well-informed decisions regarding ESG integrations of ESG in investments. For&#xD;
investors, the findings suggest that while ESG investing—particularly in governance-&#xD;
related aspects—can deliver positive financial outcomes, there is still a need for&#xD;
greater awareness and integration of environmental and social factors into investment&#xD;
strategies. Investors should adopt a more comprehensive approach to ESG,&#xD;
recognizing that long-term value creation is likely to be enhanced by sustainable&#xD;
practices.&#xD;
This thesis contributes to the growing literature on ESG investing by providing a&#xD;
detailed analysis of the Indian market. While governance factors are already&#xD;
recognised for their positive financial impact, environmental and social factors require&#xD;
further integration into investment strategies. The findings emphasise the need for&#xD;
sector-specific and investor-specific research to better understand the role of ESG in&#xD;
different contexts. Future research should focus on methodological innovations,&#xD;
regulatory changes' impact, and behavioural factors' influence on ESG investment&#xD;
performance.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A STUDY ON QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ETHIOPIAN UNIVERSITIES: PRACTICES AND PROSPECTS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22326" />
    <author>
      <name>WONDEMGEZAHU, ASALF HABTEGEORGIS</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22326</id>
    <updated>2025-12-02T06:03:05Z</updated>
    <published>2025-11-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A STUDY ON QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ETHIOPIAN UNIVERSITIES: PRACTICES AND PROSPECTS
Authors: WONDEMGEZAHU, ASALF HABTEGEORGIS
Abstract: Objective: The main objective of this study is to examine the quality management and&#xD;
assurance practices in Ethiopian higher education institutions and to propose better strategies&#xD;
for enhancing the quality of education. The study aims to evaluate the current state of quality&#xD;
management systems and identify challenges in implementing quality standards in the&#xD;
country's universities.&#xD;
Rationale: Quality in higher education is crucial for national development, as it fosters&#xD;
excellence, competitiveness, and innovation. Ethiopia has seen growth in the number of&#xD;
universities but faces challenges like low enrolement rates, poor infrastructure, and inadequate&#xD;
staff quality. Monitoring quality management and accreditation processes is essential for&#xD;
improving education standards, enhancing productivity, and contributing to the country's&#xD;
economic development.&#xD;
Methodology: The study uses a mixed research methodology. A quantitative survey was&#xD;
conducted with 472 students and faculty members, while a qualitative study involved 20&#xD;
quality assurance unit heads from 11 universities and four senior experts from the Ministry of&#xD;
Education and the Higher Education Relevance and Quality Agency. The data collected helped&#xD;
analyze current quality management practices, challenges, and opportunities for improvement&#xD;
in Ethiopian higher education institutions.&#xD;
Key Findings:&#xD;
1. Quality management is a key process that ensures adherence to education standards,&#xD;
supporting effective teaching and learning.&#xD;
2. Implementation of quality management practices such as curriculum harmonization&#xD;
reforms and ISO 9001 in laboratories has begun.&#xD;
3. Despite these initiatives, challenges persist, including a lack of focus on evaluating&#xD;
university performance and insufficient budget allocation for quality improvement.&#xD;
vii&#xD;
4. Limited infrastructure, staff quality issues, and a lack of monitoring mechanisms&#xD;
continue to hinder the effectiveness of the education system.&#xD;
Implications: The findings suggest that while there have been positive steps toward quality&#xD;
management in Ethiopian higher education, significant gaps remain. The lack of&#xD;
comprehensive performance evaluation systems and budget constraints prevent the full&#xD;
potential of quality management practices from being realized. Therefore, there is a need for&#xD;
stronger institutional commitment to quality assurance, as well as better integration of quality&#xD;
management models and frameworks.&#xD;
Recommendations:&#xD;
1. Institutions should adopt and integrate quality enhancement models such as ISO 9000,&#xD;
Benchmarking, and the EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management).&#xD;
2. The government and universities need to prioritize investment in quality assurance&#xD;
systems, including more rigorous monitoring and evaluation of performance.&#xD;
3. A focus on smart learning mechanisms, academic awards, and awareness programs can&#xD;
help create a culture of continuous improvement in education.&#xD;
4. Collaboration between the Ministry of Education, universities, and quality assurance&#xD;
agencies is essential for creating effective strategies for quality management.&#xD;
Future Research: Future research should explore the impact of specific quality management&#xD;
models on student outcomes and institutional performance. Additionally, studies can&#xD;
investigate the role of technology and digital learning in enhancing educational quality. A&#xD;
deeper analysis of regional differences and challenges in the implementation of quality&#xD;
assurance practices could also provide valuable insights.&#xD;
Conclusion: Quality management in Ethiopian higher education is a multifaceted process that&#xD;
requires ongoing attention and improvement. While progress has been made, challenges such&#xD;
as inadequate funding, poor infrastructure, and insufficient monitoring remain significant&#xD;
viii&#xD;
barriers to achieving the desired quality standards. The adoption of quality assurance&#xD;
frameworks, along with stronger institutional and governmental support, is crucial for&#xD;
enhancing the effectiveness and impact of higher education in Ethiopia.&#xD;
Limitations: The study is limited by its focus on a selected sample of universities and may not&#xD;
fully represent the experiences of all higher education institutions in Ethiopia. Additionally,&#xD;
the qualitative data is based on interviews with a limited number of experts, which may not&#xD;
capture the full range of perspectives. Further studies with larger, more diverse samples could&#xD;
provide a more comprehensive view of quality management practices across the country.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A STUDY OF FACTORS IMPACTING SOVEREIGN CREDIT RATINGS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22243" />
    <author>
      <name>GOEL, ABHINAV</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22243</id>
    <updated>2025-10-31T05:11:39Z</updated>
    <published>2025-10-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A STUDY OF FACTORS IMPACTING SOVEREIGN CREDIT RATINGS
Authors: GOEL, ABHINAV
Abstract: Sovereign Credit Ratings are independent opinions of a sovereign's ability to repay its&#xD;
debt obligations in a timely manner. Ability is a synthesis of capacity and willingness to repay.&#xD;
While the capacity to pay is generally determined through analysis of quantitative&#xD;
macroeconomic data, the willingness to pay is analyzed through study of various qualitative&#xD;
variables. (Ozturk, 2016)&#xD;
SCRs influence a sovereign’s access to and cost of international debt funds. SCRs can&#xD;
also influence flow of money into the economy, including foreign direct investment (FDI).&#xD;
SCRs also impacts availability and cost of borrowing for corporates and banks within the&#xD;
country through concepts like country ceiling. SCRs help international investors to choose and&#xD;
optimally price credit risk, while lending to sovereigns and corporate &amp; banking entities&#xD;
domiciled within the sovereign.&#xD;
A study of the methodologies of the three large credit rating agencies (CRAs – S&amp;P,&#xD;
Moody’s &amp; Fitch) shows that they evaluate both quantitative and qualitative factors to arrive&#xD;
at their sovereign credit rating decisions. However, most existing academic studies analyses&#xD;
only quantitative factors, without considering the CRA methodologies. While there is largely&#xD;
a consensus on which quantitative variables are important for determining SCR, a similar&#xD;
consensus on qualitative variables has not been achieved. Also, there is substantial literature&#xD;
which establishes the link between banking sector risk and sovereign credit risk in general but&#xD;
work on the qualitative aspects of banking sector risk which contribute to build-up of NPLs is&#xD;
limited.&#xD;
Overall, this work finds gaps in previous research on the issues of selection of variables&#xD;
impacting SCR; impact of qualitative variables individually and as a group on sovereign credit&#xD;
ratings; consistency in application of rating criteria across nation-groups; and qualitative&#xD;
aspects of banking sector risks. This work proposes to address some of these gaps, especially&#xD;
in the context of India. All these gaps offer a vital opportunity for researchers to make a&#xD;
significant contribution to the related research stream. While we will do an international study&#xD;
on the quantitative and qualitative factors impacting SCR, we have laid special emphasis on&#xD;
ix&#xD;
comparison of India across nation groups.&#xD;
This first work analyses the impact of qualitative factor “rule of law” on the sovereign&#xD;
credit rating. Thorough analysis has been done on the complete developed dataset using linear&#xD;
regression, R squared value and the correlation coefficient. The results indicate a positive&#xD;
linkage, having 82% positive correlation between the “Rule of Law” percentile ranking of a&#xD;
country and its sovereign credit rating across various income groups and regions. The finding&#xD;
suggests that countries striving for higher sovereign credit ratings should consider ways to&#xD;
improve their world standing on qualitative variables like the ‘Rule of Law” and not only&#xD;
concentrate on improving macroeconomic factors. While this paper studies only one variable,&#xD;
there are many other qualitative variables which could be important in determining sovereign&#xD;
credit ratings, which can subject of future research.&#xD;
For further analysis, two different datasets were developed which comprises of 55&#xD;
countries from all income groups and geographical locations with SCR obtained from two&#xD;
major CRA’s for a period of 10 years. In these two different datasets, various factors were&#xD;
replaced by their contemporary factors along with the data source. This was done to perform&#xD;
correlation analysis on these datasets individually to assess the importance of different&#xD;
parameters and to predict the sovereign credit rating using extra tree classifier. An important&#xD;
outcome is that all factors with low correlation are quantitative in nature while qualitative&#xD;
factors have high-moderate correlation with SCR. This indicates that the qualitative (socio-&#xD;
political) factors, individually and as a group, are more important in determining SCR than&#xD;
quantitative (economic) factors.&#xD;
Comparative analysis of results for these 2 datasets indicates the importance of the&#xD;
qualitative factors remains the same in determining SCR irrespective of its data source. This&#xD;
also finds the possibility of a bias in favor of “high-income” nations while assigning SCR.&#xD;
Moreover, banking sector factors appear to have moderate correlation with SCR. The results&#xD;
analysis reflects that given the importance of qualitative factors in determination of sovereign&#xD;
credit ratings; sovereigns particularly developing/low-middle income might be better placed&#xD;
by focusing on socio-political reforms instead of focusing only on economic factors.&#xD;
The third task analyses data related to NPLs and other banking performance parameters&#xD;
taken from institutions like RBI and World Bank. The findings of this work reveal that bank&#xD;
ownership in India is a major factor impacting levels of stressed assets with PSBs having&#xD;
relatively worse asset quality than private and foreign banks operating in India. Moreover,&#xD;
quality of regulatory system plays a key role in timely stress recognition and maintaining the&#xD;
health of a country’s banking system.&#xD;
x&#xD;
The fourth task analyses the evolution of the stressed assets resolution framework in&#xD;
India from 1985 to 2020 and its impact on the recovery rate, recovery time and amounts&#xD;
recovered. It shows that a pro-creditor stance to resolution has worked better in India than a&#xD;
pro-debtor stance. Though time to recovery has improved substantially, most cases under IBC&#xD;
are breaching the timeline stipulated under law. In an international context, post-IBC, India has&#xD;
made substantial improvement in recovery rates, which are now much higher than developing&#xD;
country peers and moving towards developed countries standards. Also, the time to recovery&#xD;
has substantially reduced and is now closer to developing country peers though still poor&#xD;
compared to developed countries. Indian cost of recovery has meanwhile remained stagnant&#xD;
and in the middle of the stack in the comparison.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>STUDY OF INDUSTRY 4.0  TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION IN INDIA</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/21775" />
    <author>
      <name>TAYAL, ANKUR</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/21775</id>
    <updated>2025-07-07T05:09:48Z</updated>
    <published>2025-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: STUDY OF INDUSTRY 4.0  TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION IN INDIA
Authors: TAYAL, ANKUR
Abstract: Objective&#xD;
The study aims to explore and evaluate the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in the &#xD;
Indian construction industry, emphasizing their role in achieving sustainability. Key &#xD;
objectives include identifying enablers and barriers, analyzing sustainability dimensions &#xD;
(economic, social, and environmental), assessing perceived risks, and formulating &#xD;
strategies for effective technology integration.&#xD;
Rationale&#xD;
The construction industry, traditionally resistant to innovation, faces significant challenges &#xD;
in adopting advanced digital technologies. With growing demands for sustainable &#xD;
practices, Industry 4.0 offers transformative potential, particularly in developing nations &#xD;
like India. However, barriers such as high costs, skill shortages, and regulatory &#xD;
uncertainties necessitate a comprehensive study to bridge research gaps and provide &#xD;
actionable insights.&#xD;
Methodology&#xD;
A mixed-method approach was employed, including:&#xD;
• Systematic Literature Review: Identifying gaps and establishing a knowledge &#xD;
foundation.&#xD;
• Empirical Analysis: Utilizing methods like Fuzzy SWARA, Fuzzy COPRAS, and &#xD;
Fuzzy AHP to rank enablers, barriers, and sustainability factors.&#xD;
• Case Studies: Examining real-world implementations of Industry 4.0 technologies &#xD;
in Indian construction firms.&#xD;
• Surveys and Expert Interviews: Collecting data from industry stakeholders to &#xD;
understand perceptions and challenges.&#xD;
P a g e | X&#xD;
Key Findings&#xD;
1. Enablers: Strategic planning, government regulations, and technological &#xD;
innovations like AI, IoT, and BIM were critical.&#xD;
2. Barriers: High initial costs, lack of skilled workforce, and cybersecurity threats &#xD;
emerged as significant challenges.&#xD;
3. Sustainability Impact: Industry 4.0 technologies enhanced efficiency, reduced &#xD;
waste, and improved safety, addressing the triple bottom line dimensions.&#xD;
4. Risk Perceptions: Cybersecurity risks and data privacy were the most critical &#xD;
concerns for stakeholders.&#xD;
Implications&#xD;
The findings underscore the need for a robust framework to facilitate Industry 4.0 &#xD;
adoption. By addressing barriers and leveraging enablers, the construction industry can &#xD;
achieve significant advancements in sustainability, productivity, and competitiveness.&#xD;
Recommendations and Future Research&#xD;
• Policy Recommendations: Develop standardized regulations and offer financial &#xD;
incentives to reduce adoption barriers.&#xD;
• Training Programs: Enhance workforce readiness through industry-academia &#xD;
collaboration.&#xD;
• Technology Customization: Tailor Industry 4.0 solutions to local contexts.&#xD;
• Future research should explore long-term impacts of Industry 4.0 adoption on job &#xD;
markets and urban infrastructure planning.&#xD;
Conclusions and Limitations&#xD;
The research highlights Industry 4.0 as a pivotal driver for sustainable transformation in &#xD;
construction. However, its adoption is constrained by financial, technological, and &#xD;
organizational challenges. Limitations include the focus on Indian contexts and the &#xD;
reliance on self-reported data, which may introduce biases.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

