<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/16282" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/16282</id>
  <updated>2026-09-22T10:24:10Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-09-22T10:24:10Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>CART ABANDONMENT ANALYSIS: IDENTIFYING DROP-OFF PATTERNS AND RECOVERY STRATEGIES</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23105" />
    <author>
      <name>JYOTI</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Seema (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23105</id>
    <updated>2026-09-18T04:10:49Z</updated>
    <published>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: CART ABANDONMENT ANALYSIS: IDENTIFYING DROP-OFF PATTERNS AND RECOVERY STRATEGIES
Authors: JYOTI; Seema (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: Cart abandonment — the phenomenon where online shoppers add products to their digital cart &#xD;
but exit without completing the purchase — represents one of the most significant yet &#xD;
underutilised revenue opportunities in e-commerce. With global cart abandonment rates &#xD;
averaging 70–75% and India-specific rates ranging from 60–85% depending on category, the &#xD;
cumulative revenue loss runs into billions of dollars annually. &#xD;
This study investigates cart abandonment from two complementary angles: identifying where &#xD;
and why drop-offs occur across the purchase funnel, and evaluating the effectiveness of various &#xD;
recovery strategies deployed post-abandonment. Primary data was collected through a &#xD;
structured survey of 150 online shoppers across Indian metro and Tier-2 cities, supplemented &#xD;
by secondary data from Baymard Institute, Statista, Unicommerce, IAMAI, Klaviyo, and peer&#xD;
reviewed academic literature. &#xD;
Key findings reveal that high shipping costs, price comparison behaviour, complicated &#xD;
checkout processes, and the absence of preferred payment methods — particularly Cash on &#xD;
Delivery and EMI options — are the primary abandonment triggers in the Indian market. The &#xD;
study also identifies that 73% of respondents shop via mobile devices, yet mobile has a &#xD;
disproportionately high abandonment rate, pointing to significant UX friction in mobile &#xD;
checkout flows. Factor analysis grouped abandonment reasons into three clusters: Cost &#xD;
Friction, Process Friction, and Trust and Readiness factors. &#xD;
On the recovery side, personalised email campaigns with a discount incentive emerged as the &#xD;
most effective touchpoint (52% recovery rate), followed closely by WhatsApp reminders &#xD;
(44%) — a finding that reflects India's WhatsApp-first communication culture and has &#xD;
significant implications for D2C brand strategy. Recovery probability drops sharply after 72 &#xD;
hours, validating the industry-standard three-email sequence. &#xD;
The study concludes with the STAR Framework — Segment, Target, Act, refine — a &#xD;
structured, four-step approach to abandonment recovery that emphasises behavioural &#xD;
segmentation before recovery action, helping brands maximise ROI on their retention &#xD;
marketing spend. Practical recommendations are offered across checkout UX, pricing &#xD;
transparency, mobile optimisation, and multi-channel recovery strategy.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PREDICTING PERSONAL SAVINGS GOAL ATTAINMENT USING MACHINE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLASSIFICATION MODELS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23104" />
    <author>
      <name>JINDAL, MANAV</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Lata, Kusum (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23104</id>
    <updated>2026-09-17T04:18:14Z</updated>
    <published>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: PREDICTING PERSONAL SAVINGS GOAL ATTAINMENT USING MACHINE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLASSIFICATION MODELS
Authors: JINDAL, MANAV; Lata, Kusum (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: The current study evaluates the potential and efficiency of classification models &#xD;
using machine learning for individual savings goals predictions. The study was &#xD;
inspired by an evident gap within the academic literature on personal finance. While &#xD;
the phenomenon of macroeconomic saving behavior has been studied thoroughly, &#xD;
there is virtually no discussion of predictive modeling at the individual level based &#xD;
on machine-learned behavioral patterns. Modern systems used in retail banking &#xD;
and financial advisory services operate on static heuristic algorithms that do not take &#xD;
into consideration the diversity of individual financial profiles. &#xD;
The dataset analyzed is artificial, containing 32,424 samples and 20 initial features &#xD;
related to personal finance theory. Seven new behavioral features have been created &#xD;
based on initial ones using personal finance theory, such as expense-income ratio, savings &#xD;
ratio, and logarithm of total savings. The resulting feature space contains 27 dimensions. &#xD;
There is almost an equal distribution between the two classes (50.5% meet the savings &#xD;
target, while 49.5% fail to do so). &#xD;
Models which were considered for training and performance measurement increased in &#xD;
complexity as follows: Logistic Regression being the baseline model, followed by &#xD;
Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, and Long Short-Term Memory Neural &#xD;
Network. In terms of performance metrics, AUC-ROC was used primarily, while the &#xD;
other performance metrics included F1 Score, Precision, Recall, Accuracy, and Cross &#xD;
Validation AUC-ROC &#xD;
There was found to be a reliable pattern of performance gains with greater model &#xD;
complexity. The optimized XGBoost model proved to be the superior classifier, having &#xD;
achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.9999, an F1 Score of 0.9959, and an Accuracy score of &#xD;
0.9958 – decreasing overall classification mistakes by a factor of over 22x (from 621, &#xD;
Logistic Regression). The LSTM network provided good performance with AUC-ROC &#xD;
of 0.9997, but fell short compared to the gradient boosting approaches. &#xD;
Using SHAP analysis on the optimal model, it was discovered that the two most &#xD;
predictive factors in saving goal achievement were total savings (log-transformed) and &#xD;
income per month. Importantly, demographic features such as age, gender, education, &#xD;
employment, and geography did not play a meaningful role in predictions. &#xD;
The research led to the conclusion that the application of machine learning, especially &#xD;
XGBoost along with suitable feature engineering, provides a feasible platform for &#xD;
personalized and proactive savings advice systems.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF PERCEIVED AUTHENTICITY AND TRUST ON PURCHASE INTENTION- INFLUENCER-OWNED BRANDS VS CORPORATE BRANDS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23103" />
    <author>
      <name>SHARMA, ASHISH</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Gupta, Shelly (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23103</id>
    <updated>2026-09-17T04:08:42Z</updated>
    <published>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF PERCEIVED AUTHENTICITY AND TRUST ON PURCHASE INTENTION- INFLUENCER-OWNED BRANDS VS CORPORATE BRANDS
Authors: SHARMA, ASHISH; Gupta, Shelly (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: The fast-changing nature of digital platforms and social media has greatly impacted the world &#xD;
of marketing, leading to the emergence of a new type of brand called influencer-owned brands. &#xD;
Influencers, who used to build their following by creating great content, are now using their &#xD;
individual brand image, credibility, and fan interactions to produce their own brands. This trend &#xD;
has brought about a clear rivalry between influencer-owned brands and corporate brands, &#xD;
affecting consumer decision-making processes. &#xD;
 &#xD;
In spite of the rising popularity of influencer-owned brands, one important issue still remains – their ability to impact consumer purchase behavior. Influencers have been proven to drive &#xD;
consumer awareness and interaction, but it is yet to be determined if consumers trust these &#xD;
brands enough to purchase from them. To fill this research void, this study will explore the &#xD;
effects of authenticity, brand trust, social influence, and price on purchase intent. &#xD;
The present research, titled “A Study on the Impact of Perceived Authenticity and Trust on &#xD;
Purchase Intention: Influencer-Owned Brands vs Corporate Brands,” primarily focuses on &#xD;
understanding consumer perception and behaviour in the context of these two competing brand &#xD;
categories. The study seeks to evaluate whether influencer-owned brands are able to match or &#xD;
surpass corporate brands in terms of trust, authenticity, and overall consumer acceptance. &#xD;
 &#xD;
A descriptive research design was used during the study. Primary data collection was performed &#xD;
using a structured questionnaire developed according to the criteria set by a five-point Likert &#xD;
scale. The following measures have been included in the questionnaire: awareness, perceived &#xD;
authenticity,  brand trust, social influence, price perception, and purchase intention. A total of &#xD;
150 respondents were chosen randomly using convenience sampling, and the obtained results &#xD;
were processed using Microsoft Excel. Data analysis techniques, including descriptive &#xD;
statistics, correlation analysis,  and multiple regression analysis, were utilized. &#xD;
 &#xD;
As can be seen from the results obtained, the  factor that has the highest impact on consumers' &#xD;
awareness and perception is social influence. Social media trends, peer behaviour, influencers, &#xD;
and other factors significantly affect the awareness of consumers. Nevertheless, the impact of &#xD;
social influence on purchase intentions may be rather low because people often get persuaded &#xD;
to buy things that do not correspond to their needs and preferences. &#xD;
 &#xD;
It should also be noted that perceived authenticity is moderate. In other words, consumers relate &#xD;
well to influencers; however, they are  skeptical towards the products that influencers promote &#xD;
and brands that they own. Brand trust is one more variable that impacts consumer awareness &#xD;
and perception. As it has already been mentioned above, corporate brands enjoy higher levels &#xD;
of trust because of their reputation and consistency. &#xD;
 &#xD;
Finally, price perception can be highlighted as one more variable that impacts consumer &#xD;
awareness and perception. In this case, people tend to make purchases based on the principle &#xD;
of value for money; they may be interested in products promoted by influencers but will not &#xD;
buy them if the prices are too high.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF IND AS IN INDIA</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23102" />
    <author>
      <name>MIRWANI, ASHISH</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Gupta, Shelly (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/23102</id>
    <updated>2026-09-17T04:04:37Z</updated>
    <published>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF IND AS IN INDIA
Authors: MIRWANI, ASHISH; Gupta, Shelly (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: Financial reporting, at its core, is about trust. It’s how businesses communicate to the outside world whether &#xD;
they are doing well, struggling, or somewhere in between. As global capital markets have grown &#xD;
increasingly interconnected, the ability of investors, analysts, and lenders to meaningfully compare &#xD;
companies across borders has become both more important and more complicated. &#xD;
This research project takes a broad look at the global landscape of financial reporting standards from the &#xD;
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles &#xD;
(GAAP) to regional variants like UK GAAP and Chinese Accounting Standards. It traces the long and &#xD;
sometimes difficult journey toward international harmonization, examines where major standards diverge, &#xD;
and explores what those differences mean in practice for financial statement users. &#xD;
A significant part of the project is dedicated to Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) India’s own version &#xD;
of IFRS, developed through a convergence process led by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) and the &#xD;
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). The research explores the story behind Ind AS, what &#xD;
makes it different from both old Indian GAAP and full IFRS, and why it matters so much for India’s &#xD;
economic future. &#xD;
To complement the theoretical and comparative analysis, this project incorporates primary empirical data &#xD;
collected through a structured Google Form survey of 120 respondents a mix of finance students, chartered &#xD;
accountants, corporate finance professionals, investment analysts, and bankers. The survey findings provide &#xD;
a grounded, user-level view of how Ind AS is actually being experienced in practice.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

