<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/42" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/42</id>
  <updated>2026-07-01T23:49:40Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-01T23:49:40Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>LOAD DEFORMATION BEHAVIOUR OF  STONE COLUMN IN EXPANSIVE SOIL  REINFORCED WITH GEOSYNTHETICS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22943" />
    <author>
      <name>SINGH, ISTUTI</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>SAHU, A. K. (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22943</id>
    <updated>2026-06-25T05:08:34Z</updated>
    <published>2025-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: LOAD DEFORMATION BEHAVIOUR OF  STONE COLUMN IN EXPANSIVE SOIL  REINFORCED WITH GEOSYNTHETICS
Authors: SINGH, ISTUTI; SAHU, A. K. (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: The present study investigates the improvement of weak soils using granular &#xD;
columns, with emphasis on the role of geosynthetic encasement and iron dust &#xD;
inclusion in enhancing load-bearing capacity and reducing settlement. Soft soils &#xD;
often exhibit excessive compressibility and inadequate strength, making them &#xD;
unsuitable for direct foundation support. To address these challenges, granular &#xD;
columns are widely employed; however, their efficiency depends on factors such as &#xD;
column arrangement, diameter, and confinement. This research systematically &#xD;
explores the behavior of both single and group columns under different conditions &#xD;
to identify optimum configurations for practical applications. &#xD;
The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the load–deformation &#xD;
behaviour of ordinary and geosynthetic-encased stone columns in expansive soil, to &#xD;
investigate the influence of column configuration, encasement material, and iron &#xD;
dust stabilization on bearing capacity and settlement characteristics, and to identify &#xD;
the most efficient ground improvement system for expansive soils. &#xD;
The study employed both experimental and numerical methods. Laboratory model &#xD;
tests were conducted on single columns of diameters 50 mm and 70 mm, as well as &#xD;
group columns arranged in triangular, square, and hexagonal patterns with varying &#xD;
spacing-to-diameter (s/d) ratios. Both ordinary and encased stone columns were &#xD;
examined, using geotextile and geogrid as encasement materials. The stone column &#xD;
mix was prepared using stone dust, fly ash, cement, and iron dust to enhance &#xD;
column strength. Tests were performed under monotonic vertical loading, and &#xD;
settlements were measured up to 50 mm. The experimental results were further &#xD;
validated using numerical modeling in PLAXIS 3D. &#xD;
The findings revealed that untreated clay beds had very low load capacity (5.9 kN &#xD;
at 50 mm settlement). Single ordinary stone columns improved the load resistance, &#xD;
with 70 mm end-bearing columns carrying 7.2 kN and floating columns 6.5 kN. &#xD;
Encased single columns showed further gains, with geotextile-encased end-bearing &#xD;
viii &#xD;
columns sustaining up to 8.15 kN, about 38% higher than untreated clay. In group &#xD;
configurations, the triangular pattern consistently gave the best performance, &#xD;
followed by square and then hexagonal arrangements. Geosynthetic encasement &#xD;
enhanced group behavior significantly, with geotextile generally outperforming &#xD;
geogrid due to better fines retention and hoop stress mobilization. The inclusion of &#xD;
iron dust in the column mix further reduced settlement and improved strength, &#xD;
particularly in group columns. &#xD;
Overall, the study concludes that the triangular arrangement of group stone &#xD;
columns, encased with geotextile or geogrid and stabilized with iron dust, provides &#xD;
the most efficient configuration. This system achieves the highest load-bearing &#xD;
capacity and the least settlement, demonstrating its practical applicability for soft &#xD;
soil improvement. The research &#xD;
contributes valuable insights into the design and optimization of granular column &#xD;
foundations and establishes the benefits of combining geosynthetic encasement &#xD;
with stabilizing additives. &#xD;
Additionally, the experimental program was conducted using single columns of &#xD;
diameters 20 mm, 30 mm, and 50 mm, along with group columns arranged as &#xD;
double columns along the mould diameter and triangular columns with a spacing&#xD;
to-diameter ratio of 1. Tests were performed with and without encasement using &#xD;
geotextile and geogrid to assess their relative performance. Additionally, iron dust &#xD;
was introduced as a stabilizing additive to study its effect on settlement and &#xD;
strength. Load–settlement responses were recorded and analyzed to evaluate the &#xD;
comparative performance of each configuration. &#xD;
The results revealed that single columns performed best when encased with &#xD;
geotextile, with the 30 mm diameter column providing maximum load capacity. &#xD;
Group column behavior was influenced more by arrangement, with triangular &#xD;
patterns offering superior settlement resistance compared to double columns. &#xD;
Among the encasement materials, geogrid provided better confinement in group &#xD;
columns, whereas geotextile was more effective for single columns. The inclusion &#xD;
ix &#xD;
of iron dust consistently enhanced overall performance, lowering settlements and &#xD;
increasing load capacity, particularly in group column arrangements. &#xD;
It is concluded that the most efficient configuration for ground improvement in &#xD;
weak soils is the triangular group arrangement of granular columns encased with &#xD;
geogrid and stabilized with iron dust. This combination delivers the highest load&#xD;
bearing efficiency and the least settlement, offering a practical and effective &#xD;
solution for foundation support in soft soils. The findings provide valuable insights &#xD;
into the design and application of granular columns, contributing to the &#xD;
advancement of ground improvement techniques in geotechnical engineering.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF NON STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS IN RC  FRAMES</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22936" />
    <author>
      <name>THAKUR, AKASH</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>PAL, SHILPA ( SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22936</id>
    <updated>2026-06-25T05:07:24Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF NON STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS IN RC  FRAMES
Authors: THAKUR, AKASH; PAL, SHILPA ( SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: Non-structural elements (NSEs) such as cable trays, pipelines, HVAC systems, and &#xD;
suspended utilities are highly vulnerable during earthquakes and play an important role &#xD;
in maintaining building functionality after seismic events. Recognizing the importance &#xD;
of seismic safety of utility systems, IS 1893 introduced new provisions for &#xD;
“Architectural Elements and Utilities (AEUs)” in Indian seismic design practice. &#xD;
However, limited experimental validation is available for these newly introduced &#xD;
provisions. The present study investigates the seismic behaviour of cable tray systems &#xD;
installed in a structural frame model subjected to shake table excitation. Cable trays &#xD;
with rigid and flexible support configurations were installed at different floor levels, &#xD;
and acceleration response was measured at the base, floor slabs, and cable tray &#xD;
locations under excitation frequencies ranging from 0.5 Hz to 12 Hz. &#xD;
Experimental results showed significant floor acceleration amplification at upper &#xD;
floors, with maximum Peak Floor Acceleration (PFA) of 1.5g observed at the third &#xD;
floor. Resonance behaviour was observed between 6.5 Hz and 8.5 Hz, resulting in &#xD;
sudden increase in cable tray acceleration response. The amplification factor increases &#xD;
significantly with elevation, showing a 50.38% rise from the 1st to the 2nd floor and a &#xD;
further 25.00% rise from the 2nd to the 3rd floor, resulting in an overall increase of &#xD;
87.97% from the 1st to the 3rd floor. The flexible support system shows the highest &#xD;
amplification increase at the 1st floor (81.82%), while the increase at the 2nd and 3rd &#xD;
floors is approximately 53–59% compared to the rigid support system. &#xD;
Comparative analysis between experimentally obtained seismic forces and codal force &#xD;
predictions based on Draft IS 1893 and ASCE 7 indicated that actual seismic demand &#xD;
exceeded equivalent static codal predictions near resonance conditions. Where &#xD;
experimental force exceeded the IS 1893 value approximately 71%. The study &#xD;
highlights the importance of considering floor amplification, resonance effects, and &#xD;
support flexibility in seismic design of utility systems. The findings of the study &#xD;
contribute toward improved understanding of seismic behaviour of non-structural &#xD;
utility systems and provide practical design recommendations for seismic anchorage &#xD;
and support systems in RC buildings.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT  FOR LIFE EXTENSION AND  RETROFITTING OF AGING OFFSHORE  PLATFORMS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22935" />
    <author>
      <name>GUPTA, PRANJAL</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>PAL, SHILPA (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22935</id>
    <updated>2026-06-25T05:07:15Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT  FOR LIFE EXTENSION AND  RETROFITTING OF AGING OFFSHORE  PLATFORMS
Authors: GUPTA, PRANJAL; PAL, SHILPA (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: Hydrocarbons continue to play an important role in meeting global energy demand. &#xD;
In India, offshore oil and gas facilities, especially in the western offshore region, &#xD;
contribute significantly to domestic production and energy security. However, &#xD;
many fixed jacket platforms in fields such as Mumbai High are now operating &#xD;
beyond their actual design life and are exposed to long-term deterioration due to &#xD;
wave loading, corrosion, fatigue, accidental damage, and changing operational &#xD;
requirements. These factors make periodic reassessment and re-certification &#xD;
essential to ensure the continued structural integrity and safe operation of aging &#xD;
offshore platforms. &#xD;
The present study focuses on the structural reassessment of an existing fixed jacket&#xD;
type offshore platform based on the recommendations of the American Petroleum &#xD;
Institute (API) for life extension assessment. Site-specific metocean data for the &#xD;
Gulf of Kutch, including wave, wind, and current conditions corresponding to both &#xD;
operating and extreme storm environments, are considered during the analysis. A &#xD;
global linear in-place structural analysis is performed using SACS v24 to evaluate &#xD;
the adequacy of jacket members and tubular joints under combined operational and &#xD;
environmental loading conditions. Member and joint utilization checks are &#xD;
performed in accordance with API RP 2A, 22nd Edition, Working Stress Design, &#xD;
2014 provisions to identify overstressed structural components. &#xD;
For loading conditions where the platform does not meet the prescribed acceptance &#xD;
criteria, a nonlinear ultimate strength assessment is performed using static pushover &#xD;
analysis to capture the actual structural response under extreme environmental &#xD;
loading. Incremental wave loading is applied until structural collapse to investigate &#xD;
the failure sequence, redistribution of internal forces, and ultimate collapse &#xD;
behaviour of the jacket system. The Reserve Strength Ratio (RSR), also referred to &#xD;
as the Collapse Load Factor (CLF), is evaluated to determine the residual strength &#xD;
and redundancy of the platform. &#xD;
The study also examines strengthening and retrofitting techniques for overstressed &#xD;
subsea tubular joints, which remain one of the major challenges in rehabilitation of &#xD;
aging offshore structures. Retrofit schemes using ring stiffeners and friction-grip &#xD;
clamp systems are evaluated for strengthening deficient joints and facilitating &#xD;
iv &#xD;
member replacement without extensive modification to the existing structure. To &#xD;
investigate local joint behaviour in detail, Component-Based Finite Element &#xD;
Analysis (CBFEA) is carried out using IDEA StatiCa 26.0. Detailed finite element &#xD;
models of tubular joints incorporating ring stiffeners and clamp arrangements are &#xD;
developed to evaluate stress distribution, load transfer mechanisms, and structural &#xD;
performance under applied loading conditions. &#xD;
The results of the study indicate that the adopted reassessment and strengthening &#xD;
approach improves both global and local structural performance of the aging jacket &#xD;
platform. From the in-place analysis, 20 tubular joints are found overstressed under &#xD;
extreme storm loading. After grout filling, most of the joints meet the unity check &#xD;
requirement and for remaining critical joints retrofitting procedures are performed. &#xD;
The pushover analysis shows adequate global reserve strength, with the minimum &#xD;
RSR obtained as 1.80 against the required value of 1.60, and the maximum RSR &#xD;
obtained as 3.20. For the proposed mechanical friction-grip clamp, all IDEA &#xD;
StatiCa checks remain within allowable limits, with maximum bolt utilization of &#xD;
87.2%, weld utilization of 76.8%, and first buckling factor of 43.85. The ring &#xD;
stiffener model also shows improvement in local stress distribution, with the &#xD;
equivalent stress in members reducing from 355.3 MPa to 286.9 MPa. These results &#xD;
confirm that targeted retrofitting using ring stiffeners and friction-grip clamp &#xD;
systems can improve the residual capacity and support the life extension of the &#xD;
existing offshore jacket platform.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF RCC STRUCTURES UNDER INDIAN SEISMIC CONDITION</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22932" />
    <author>
      <name>PORE, VISHNU</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Robert, B.R.G. (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22932</id>
    <updated>2026-06-25T05:06:49Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF RCC STRUCTURES UNDER INDIAN SEISMIC CONDITION
Authors: PORE, VISHNU; Robert, B.R.G. (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: The increasing occurrence of earthquakes in different seismic regions has emphasized &#xD;
the necessity for reliable structural analysis methods in reinforced cement concrete &#xD;
(RCC) buildings. This study presents a comparative evaluation of static and dynamic &#xD;
analysis techniques for RCC structures under Indian seismic conditions. The goal of &#xD;
the research is to explore the structural behavior, seismic performance, and response &#xD;
characteristics of RCC buildings when subjected to earthquake forces as specified in &#xD;
Indian seismic design provisions, primarily based on Bureau of Indian Standards code &#xD;
recommendations such as IS 1893 and IS 456. &#xD;
In this research, multi-storey RCC structures are modeled and analyzed using ETABS. &#xD;
Pushover analysis and time history analysis, are used to assess the seismic response of &#xD;
the structures. Important response parameters such as storey displacement, storey drift, &#xD;
base shear,  are compared for  seismic zones  IV . &#xD;
This dissertation presents a detailed comparative study of the pushover analysis of &#xD;
RCC structures with rigid joints under Indian seismic conditions. The primary aim of &#xD;
the study is to evaluate, compare, and interpret the nonlinear seismic behavior of &#xD;
multistorey RCC buildings by considering key performance parameters such as base &#xD;
shear, terrace displacement. The buildings are designed in accordance with the &#xD;
provisions of IS 456:2000 for reinforced concrete design and IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 for &#xD;
earthquake-resistant design of structures. The seismic performance is assessed using &#xD;
the concepts of performance-based seismic design as defined in international &#xD;
guidelines such as FEMA 356 and ATC-40. &#xD;
For the purpose of analysis, three-dimensional numerical models of RCC buildings  &#xD;
are developed using ETABS software. Gravity loads and seismic loads are applied as &#xD;
per Indian Standard codes. Nonlinear hinge properties are assigned to beams and &#xD;
columns to simulate realistic material behavior under increasing lateral loads. The &#xD;
pushover analysis is carried out by applying incremental lateral load patterns in both &#xD;
principal horizontal directions until the target displacement or collapse mechanism is &#xD;
achieved.  &#xD;
A comparative assessment of different structural configurations is performed to &#xD;
investigate their influence on seismic behavior. The study highlights how changes in &#xD;
stiffness, strength, and ductility affect the overall performance of RCC structures. &#xD;
Storey-wise displacement, drift ratios, and plastic hinge distribution patterns are &#xD;
critically examined to identify vulnerable zones and potential failure mechanisms. &#xD;
ix &#xD;
Special emphasis is placed on understanding the nonlinear response characteristics of &#xD;
rigid jointed RCC frames, which are extensively used in Indian construction practice. &#xD;
The results obtained from the analysis clearly demonstrate that PA is highly effective &#xD;
in capturing the progressive damage behavior and post-elastic response of RCC &#xD;
buildings, which cannot be adequately assessed through linear static or dynamic &#xD;
methods. The study reveals that the formation and progression of plastic hinges follow &#xD;
distinct patterns that govern the ultimate collapse mechanism of the structure. It is &#xD;
observed that structures designed strictly as per code provisions still exhibit significant &#xD;
nonlinear deformations under severe seismic excitation, emphasizing the importance &#xD;
of performance-based evaluation. &#xD;
The outcomes of this study provide valuable insights into the seismic performance of &#xD;
RCC buildings under Indian seismic conditions and confirm the reliability of pushover &#xD;
analysis as a practical and efficient tool for seismic evaluation. The findings of this &#xD;
research are expected to assist structural engineers in identifying seismic deficiencies, &#xD;
improving structural configurations, and adopting safer design practices. The study &#xD;
also highlights the importance of incorporating nonlinear analysis procedures into &#xD;
routine seismic design and assessment workflows to enhance the safety, resilience, and &#xD;
sustainability of reinforced concrete structures in earthquake-prone regions of India.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

