<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/105" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/105</id>
  <updated>2026-07-02T10:03:33Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-02T10:03:33Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>CRITICAL FACTORS FOR GENERATIVE AI-  DRIVEN GREEN VALUE CREATION IN SUPPLY  CHAINS: A HIERARCHICAL FUZZY BEST WORST METHOD APPROACH</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22945" />
    <author>
      <name>SISODIYA, ABHISHEK KUMAR</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Kumar, Pravin (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22945</id>
    <updated>2026-06-25T05:08:50Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: CRITICAL FACTORS FOR GENERATIVE AI-  DRIVEN GREEN VALUE CREATION IN SUPPLY  CHAINS: A HIERARCHICAL FUZZY BEST WORST METHOD APPROACH
Authors: SISODIYA, ABHISHEK KUMAR; Kumar, Pravin (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: Green value creation has become a central objective for modern supply chains as &#xD;
organizations increasingly adopt circular and sustainable practices. While prior &#xD;
research has identified multiple environmental and sustainability-related factors across &#xD;
supply chain activities, the role of advanced digital technologies—particularly &#xD;
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)—in shaping and prioritizing these factors &#xD;
remains insufficiently explored. Moreover, existing studies often rely on conventional &#xD;
analytical approaches and lack structured decision-making frameworks capable of &#xD;
addressing uncertainty and expert subjectivity. &#xD;
This study aims to identify and prioritize the critical factors influencing GenAI-driven &#xD;
green value creation in supply chains using a Hierarchical Fuzzy Best–Worst Method &#xD;
(HFBWM) approach. Based on an extensive review of the literature and expert &#xD;
consultation, five key supply chain dimensions—Supplier, Product, Packaging, &#xD;
Logistics, and Consumption—along with eighteen associated sub-factors are identified &#xD;
and validated. The HFBWM is employed to systematically capture expert judgments &#xD;
under uncertainty and to derive local and global priority weights. &#xD;
The results reveal that product-related factors, particularly design for reuse, modular &#xD;
design, and circular product design, are the most influential drivers of green value &#xD;
creation, followed by sustainable packaging and consumption-oriented factors. &#xD;
Scenario-based analysis further demonstrates that GenAI capabilities—through &#xD;
iv &#xD;
interactive and non-interactive knowledge search—enhance decision-making quality, &#xD;
reduce dependence asymmetry, and strengthen inter-organizational collaboration, &#xD;
thereby reshaping the prioritization of green value creation factors. &#xD;
The study contributes to the literature by integrating fuzzy multi-criteria decision&#xD;
making with GenAI-enabled supply chain capabilities and offers a practical decision&#xD;
support framework for managers seeking to prioritize high-impact sustainability &#xD;
initiatives. The proposed approach provides actionable insights for leveraging GenAI &#xD;
to support strategic green value creation in complex and uncertain supply chain &#xD;
environments.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NUMERICAL ANALSIS AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE  OPTIMISATION OF  THE NACA 2415 AIRFOIL USING A  TAGUCHI-FUZZY FRAMEWORK</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22926" />
    <author>
      <name>SONI, PULKIT</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Zunaid, Mohammad (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22926</id>
    <updated>2026-06-25T04:57:31Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: NUMERICAL ANALSIS AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE  OPTIMISATION OF  THE NACA 2415 AIRFOIL USING A  TAGUCHI-FUZZY FRAMEWORK
Authors: SONI, PULKIT; Zunaid, Mohammad (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: Small fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles operating at chord Reynolds numbers of &#xD;
Re = 10⁵–5×10⁶ face a fundamental aerodynamic challenge: the gap between two&#xD;
dimensional section performance predicted by computational fluid dynamics and the &#xD;
drastically degraded efficiency of real, aspect-ratio-constrained three-dimensional &#xD;
wings. This study addresses that gap through a three-phase hierarchical investigation &#xD;
of the NACA 2415 aerofoil, integrating Taguchi design of experiments, Mamdani &#xD;
fuzzy multi-objective optimisation, steady-state Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes &#xD;
simulation, and surrogate-assisted optimisation into a single systematic framework &#xD;
validated against NACA Technical Report 824 experimental data. &#xD;
Phase 1 deploys a Taguchi L25(5⁵) orthogonal array — reducing a 3,125-run full &#xD;
factorial to 25 balanced simulations — to simultaneously screen five RANS turbulence &#xD;
closures (Spalart–Allmaras, k-ε Realizable, k-ω SST, SST γ–Reθ, and Reynolds Stress &#xD;
Model), five Reynolds numbers (1–12×10⁶), five angles of attack (−4° to 16°), five &#xD;
turbulence intensities (0.05%–5.00%), and four surrogate optimisation strategies &#xD;
(RSM-Kriging, NSGA-II, Sparse RSM, and Neural Network Screening). Three &#xD;
conflicting aerodynamic responses — lift coefficient, drag coefficient, and lift-to-drag &#xD;
ratio — are unified into a scalar Multi-Performance Characteristic Index via a 27-rule &#xD;
Mamdani fuzzy inference system with corrected strict-inequality boundary&#xD;
membership evaluation, a previously unreported defect whose correction changes the &#xD;
turbulence model ANOVA contribution from a spurious 12.30% to the physically &#xD;
correct 1.83%. One-way ANOVA identifies angle of attack as the dominant factor (ρ &#xD;
= 80.99–85.70%), with Reynolds number second (ρ ≈ 8–10%). The k-ω SST model &#xD;
achieves the highest multi-objective η(MPCI) level mean (−9.202 dB) due to its &#xD;
Bradshaw adverse-pressure-gradient limiter and structural turbulence-intensity &#xD;
insensitivity via cross-diffusion. Sparse RSM achieves the highest Weighted &#xD;
Composite Score of 9.13/10, uniquely detecting the NACA 2415 drag-bucket interior &#xD;
minimum at α ≈ −0.75°, independently confirmed by Neural Network Screening at α &#xD;
≈ −0.77°. Phase 2 deploys a Taguchi L9(3³) array exclusively with k-ω SST across a refined &#xD;
design space (Re = 6–12×10⁶, α = 4°–8°, TI = 0.05%–0.50%). The confirmed optimal &#xD;
configuration — Re = 12×10⁶, α = 8°, TI = 0.10° — yields CL = 1.038, CD = 0.015711, &#xD;
and |CL/CD| = 66.08, with a Taguchi additive model prediction error of only 0.26%, &#xD;
validating negligible factor interactions. Turbulence intensity contributes ρ ≈ 0.00% &#xD;
(F = 0.04) within the tested range, providing a practically significant result that &#xD;
eliminates TI as a source of CFD modelling uncertainty for this application. &#xD;
Phase 3 extends the Phase 2 optimum to a three-dimensional finite-wing RANS &#xD;
simulation at AR = 0.25 (b = 0.5 m, c = 2.0 m, A_ref = 1.0 m²). The aerodynamic &#xD;
outputs — CL = 0.12921, CD = 0.014899, |CL/CD| = 8.67, Lift = 607.908 N, Drag = &#xD;
70.096 N — reveal an 86.9% efficiency collapse from the two-dimensional optimum, &#xD;
driven by a tip-vortex-induced downwash of ε ≈ 9.33° that reduces the effective angle &#xD;
of attack from +8° to approximately −1.43°. Three independent CFD visualisations — &#xD;
velocity pathlines, static pressure vectors, and velocity magnitude vectors — provide &#xD;
mutually corroborating topological, thermodynamic, and kinematic evidence &#xD;
confirming that the entire span lies within the tip-vortex induction zone and no two&#xD;
dimensional flow region exists. The study conclusively establishes that the binding &#xD;
aerodynamic limitation of the platform is planform geometry rather than section &#xD;
performance, motivating a redesign to AR = 6–8 to recover 75%–86% of the two&#xD;
dimensional efficiency ceiling.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DEVELOPING A PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR  HYDRAULIC MACHINE MAINTENANCE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22919" />
    <author>
      <name>TRIPATHI, AMRISH</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Garg, S.K. (SUPERVISOR)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22919</id>
    <updated>2026-06-25T04:56:31Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: DEVELOPING A PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR  HYDRAULIC MACHINE MAINTENANCE
Authors: TRIPATHI, AMRISH; Garg, S.K. (SUPERVISOR)
Abstract: The hydraulic system is an essential infrastructure element of all kinds of heavy machinery used in several &#xD;
applications such as manufacturing, mining, construction, aviation, and processing industries. There are several types &#xD;
of degradations that occur in these hydraulic systems (for example, pump cavitation, seal leakage, valve erosion, &#xD;
accumulator failure, fluid contamination, among others). This leads to unexpected malfunctions accompanied by &#xD;
lengthy downtime periods, posing safety threats and causing costs. Traditionally, there have been no successful &#xD;
proactive maintenance strategies applied to address these challenges. &#xD;
The current research suggests a novel approach to predictive maintenance for hydraulic systems. The suggested &#xD;
approach relies on the Hydraulic Condition Monitoring Dataset (Hewli et al., 2015), containing 2,205 operating &#xD;
cycles collected via 17 sensors. Such sensors collect different types of physical variables, namely pressure, flow, &#xD;
temperature, vibration, and efficiency. &#xD;
The considered case study focuses on seven distinct machine learning algorithms, including Isolation Forest, One&#xD;
Class SVM, K-Means Clustering, DBSCAN, Autoencoder neural networks, 1D-CNN, and XGBoost. The analysis &#xD;
of predictive maintenance involves a set of steps to be taken. The first step refers to data preprocessing, including &#xD;
such aspects as handling missing values, normalization, and filtering out outliers. The second step relates to feature &#xD;
engineering. This stage is characterized by calculating rolling statistics and creating health indexes. The next step &#xD;
refers to data analysis, such as creating a correlation heat map and performing principal component analysis. &#xD;
Afterward, each of the algorithms is applied to the dataset, and a comparative analysis is conducted based on a 5&#xD;
fold cross-validation. &#xD;
Moreover, bibliometric analysis is presented within the current research .Sources for bibliometric analysis are taken &#xD;
from three databases – Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. The obtained data provide an overview of global &#xD;
research trends in the area of interest, pointing at prominent researchers, popular methodologies, and certain &#xD;
limitations. Bibliometric analysis indicates China to be the leading contributor, generating 30.1% of all publications &#xD;
under consideration. Besides, it becomes evident that deep learning approaches have dominated this field starting &#xD;
from 2021.   The experimental evaluation proves that XG Boost provides the best predictive performance: Accuracy &#xD;
94.2%, Recall 92.8%, F1 Score 91.5%, and AUC-ROC0.971, with inference time of 158 milliseconds. 1D CNN &#xD;
iv &#xD;
achieves second-best accuracy (91.7%), yet its inference time is threefold higher compared to XGBoost, thus &#xD;
limiting its suitability for deployment at the edge. A hierarchical framework with three levels of alertness for &#xD;
maintenance (Normal/Alert/Critical) is proposed for translating XG Boost's predictions into a maintenance strategy. &#xD;
Most important sensors are Hydraulic Pressure (PS1), Volume Flow (FS1), and Motor Power, identified via a &#xD;
feature importance analysis. These results contribute significantly to a reproducible algorithmic benchmark for &#xD;
India's manufacturing sector aiming to shift from reactive to predictive maintenance practices. &#xD;
Keywords: predictive maintenance, hydraulic systems, machine learning, XG Boost, anomaly detection, condition &#xD;
monitoring, Industry 4.0, sensor fusion, fault prognosis, UCI Hydraulic Dataset, bibliometric analysis .</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS TO  IMPLEMENTATION OF SPEED TO RECOVERY  IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN  DEVELOPMENT</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22918" />
    <author>
      <name>BHARDWAJ, PRIYATOSH</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Garg, S.K. (SUPERVISION)</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.dtu.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/repository/22918</id>
    <updated>2026-06-25T04:56:21Z</updated>
    <published>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS TO  IMPLEMENTATION OF SPEED TO RECOVERY  IN SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN  DEVELOPMENT
Authors: BHARDWAJ, PRIYATOSH; Garg, S.K. (SUPERVISION)
Abstract: Global business today is unpredictable, and companies trying to create sustainable supply &#xD;
chains are struggling with many different types of catastrophe— geopolitical disruptions, &#xD;
climate-change-induced instability, pandemic level systemic failures and rapid changes &#xD;
in technology. The speed to recover (StR) is now considered an important capability of a &#xD;
supply chain; it measures how quickly a supply chain can get back to its baseline &#xD;
performance (or a better level) after a d isruption. There has been growing interest in &#xD;
supply chain resilience and supply chain sustainability but there is still limited knowledge &#xD;
about identifying and prioritizing critical success factors (CSFs) used to implement StR &#xD;
within the context of a sustainable supply chain; this gap in the academic literature &#xD;
remains largely unexplored.. &#xD;
In response to the gap in existing literature regarding how to develop a comprehensive &#xD;
criterion for CSF evaluation, this research constructs a decision making framework &#xD;
designed to integrate both methods of fuzzy DEMATEL (Fuzzy Decision Making Trial &#xD;
and Evaluation Laboratory) for mapping out the causal structure of the interrelationships &#xD;
of CSFs, and TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) &#xD;
for ranking or prioritizing CSFs by how close they come to the ideal performance or &#xD;
benchmark. In utilizing both methodologies, this research was able to provide a more &#xD;
holistic decision supporting framework for individuals and organizations when &#xD;
evaluating CSFs than could be provided by each methodology used independently. &#xD;
A comprehensive two-phase literature synthesis yielded an initial pool of twenty &#xD;
candidate CSFs, subsequently refined to thirteen factors through a structured two-round &#xD;
Delphi expert validation process. Primary data were collected from a purposive sample &#xD;
of fifteen senior supply chain professionals representing diverse industry sectors &#xD;
including manufacturing, logistics, e-commerce, pharmaceutical, automotive, textile, &#xD;
food and beverage, chemical, and humanitarian supply chain operations. &#xD;
The Fuzzy DEMATEL analysis classified the thirteen CSFs into cause and effect groups. &#xD;
Six CSFs – Top Management Commitment, Organizational Resilience Culture, Digital &#xD;
iv &#xD;
Technology Adoption, Cross-Functional Collaboration, Environmental Regulatory &#xD;
Compliance, and Circular Economy Practices – were identified as cause-group factors &#xD;
functioning as primary systemic drivers. The subsequent TOPSIS analysis yielded a &#xD;
priority ranking in which Top Management Commitment (Ci* = 0.610), Organizational &#xD;
Resilience Culture (Ci* = 0.572), and Circular Economy Practices (Ci* = 0.565) emerged &#xD;
as the three most critical CSFs. Notably, the sustainability-oriented factors ranked among &#xD;
the top four across both methods, empirically validating the proposition that sustainability &#xD;
and supply chain resilience are complementary rather than competing strategic &#xD;
objectives. &#xD;
Findings indicate that proactive organizational investment in leadership commitment, &#xD;
cultural resilience orientation, digital infrastructure, and sustainability practices &#xD;
simultaneously accelerates recovery speed and strengthens long-term sustainability &#xD;
credentials. The integrated Fuzzy DEMATEL-TOPSIS framework provides supply chain &#xD;
managers with an actionable, evidence-based roadmap for sequential resource allocation &#xD;
and strategic capability development. &#xD;
Keywords: Critical Success Factors, Speed To Recovery, Sustainable Supply Chain &#xD;
Management, Fuzzy DEMATEL, TOPSIS, Supply Chain Resilience, Industry 4.0, Multi&#xD;
criteria Decision Making, Causal Analysis, Circular Economy.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

